{"id":2845,"date":"2022-03-01T19:48:11","date_gmt":"2022-03-01T19:48:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/?p=2845"},"modified":"2022-03-01T19:48:11","modified_gmt":"2022-03-01T19:48:11","slug":"time-for-impact-investors-and-contrarians-to-unite-behind-clean-energy-etfs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/time-for-impact-investors-and-contrarians-to-unite-behind-clean-energy-etfs\/","title":{"rendered":"Time for Impact Investors and Contrarians to Unite Behind Clean Energy ETFs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The trend is your friend.\u00a0 That is, until it isn\u2019t.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The list of best performing non-leveraged ETFs for the past 90-days is led almost exclusively by ETFs that hold the stocks of fossil-fuel-based energy and closely related companies.\u00a0 At the same time, the prices of ESG and more climate-focused impact ETFs have plunged dramatically.\u00a0 With close eyes on the ever-worsening conflict in the Ukraine and its projected effects on oil prices and inflation, few experts are expecting a reversal to come in the next six months.\u00a0 However, there are some contrarians that do see a reversal on the horizon.\u00a0 This week we look at Impact ETFs with an emphasis on environmentally focused ETFs.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>All of the approximately 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, 140 industries, and 500 ETFs have been updated on <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><b>www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Free Two Week Trial to all 5,000 plus equities and ETFs covered by ValuEngine <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/pub\/VeSubscribeInfo?pid=1\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available: \u00a0 <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuenginecapital.com\/\"><b>www.ValuEngineCapital.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The SustainFi.com website maintains a helpful list of the mind-boggling number of ETFs designed for ESG and Impact investors.\u00a0 Even more helpful, it follows a taxonomy that allows readers to zero in on the ETFs that fall into the classification that most interests them. This article only includes ETFs that contain mostly US Stocks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first grouping contains the names and tickers of 21 broad-based ESG funds and is listed below. Broad-based ESG ETFs generally utilize best-of-industry scores in Environmental, Social and Governance rankings in their methodologies to eliminate poor scorers, generally by at least 50% in each industry. There are nuances separating each.\u00a0 For example, iShares by BlackRock and MSCI have created three different levels of screened ETFs with <\/span><b>ESGU<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> screening out the bottom 50% of ESG scorers in each industry group; <\/span><b>SUSA<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> eliminates all carbon-based and other exposures from ESGU and <\/span><b>SUSL<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> focuses on the top 25% of performers in <\/span><b>SUSA.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indexes, targeted segments such as cap size, and value\/growth are available.\u00a0 What most of these have in common is that they are created primarily for risk control.\u00a0 Many studies during the last ten years have confirmed that companies that score below average on ESG have more risk of future reputation-damaging events that affect revenues and stock performance.\u00a0 Indeed, most of the funds listed here have outperformed their selected benchmarks over the last 5 years, generally with slightly better Sortino Ratios (a measure similar to Sharpe ratio but looking only at downside deviations).\u00a0 This makes them solid core investments and very suitable for the needs of institutional investors. <\/span><b>ESGU <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">with more than 20 billion dollars under management and AAA (highest) ESG rating from MSCI is a solid institutional choice.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Current ValuEngine reports on these ETF\u2019s can be viewed <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/rep\/mresearch_report\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h2><b>Broad-Based ESG-Screened Funds <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(22)<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Xtrackers S&amp;P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">IQ Candriam ESG US Equity ETF (IQSU)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SPDR S&amp;P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">WisdomTree U.S. ESG Fund (RESP)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hartford Schroders ESG US Equity ETF (HEET)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As Todd Rosenbluth of CFRA wrote for an article printed in Barron\u2019s in January, 7 of 10 funds fitting the large-cap or total market categories outperformed the S&amp;P 500 in 2021. My research using ValuEngine data shows that most of these also outperformed the S&amp;P 500 over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021. This is noteworthy since the majority of ETFs and a larger majority of mutual funds did not do so. <\/span><b>As many others have documented, we now have enough data to conclude that empirically, the outdated belief that funds that take social responsibility criteria into account must sacrifice performance is dead.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Most institutional portfolio management teams now consider ESG pillar data to be risk factors.\u00a0 From a valuation perspective, they are calculable \u201cintangibles\u201d that should be accounted for on a modernized balance sheet.\u00a0 We are quickly getting to a time where asset managers not doing so risk being criticized for not following best practices.\u00a0 Therefore, ESG ETFs are simply more prudent core investment allocations than traditional ETFs. For these reasons, most taxonomies of responsible investing in today\u2019s world make a distinction between ESG investing, also called ESG-Aware investing, and Impact Investing.\u00a0 Somewhere between the two lies Fossil-Fuel-Free Investing\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Most of the constituents of Fossil Free funds are similar. However, the resultant industry sector \u201cbets&#8221; will create cyclical outperformance and underperformance that may be considered suboptimal for institutional investors focused on benchmark tracking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Broad-based ESG ETFs are not, however, the most targeted options for investors that truly wish to align their investment dollars with their personal convictions.\u00a0 <\/span><b>ESGU, for example,<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> will contain high-carbon companies such as ExxonMobil and other companies with business practices many investors may find abhorrent for diverse reasons.\u00a0 An individual or group looking for value alignment however is unlikely to be satisfied with <\/span><b>ESGU<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> because they still own too many companies engaged in activities inconsistent with ESG objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s take a look at more targeted categories of impact ETFs.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><b>Actively Managed (7)<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">TrueShares ESG Active Opportunities ETF (ECOZ)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">American Century Sustainable Equity ETF (ESGA)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stance Equity Large Cap Core ETF (STNC)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF (GSFP)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Trend Aggregation ESG ETF (TEGS)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VictoryShares THB Mid Cap ESG ETF (MDCP)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><b>Low-Carbon and Climate Transition (6)<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SPDR MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (LOWC)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Equity ETF (JCTR)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iClima Global Decarbonization Transition Leaders ETF (CLMA)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><b>Clean Energy, Smart Grid, and Cleantech (23)<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (<\/span>QCLN)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (<\/span>PBW)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco Solar ETF (TAN)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Global X Solar ETF (RAYS)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Global X Wind Energy ETF (WNDY)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SPDR Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF (HDRO)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SPDR S&amp;P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Virtus Duff &amp; Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BlackRock Future Climate and Sustainable Economy ETF (BECO)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iClima Distributed Renewable Energy Transition Leaders ETF (SHFT)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VanEck Green Metals ETF (GMET)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><b>Water (6)<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco Water Resources ETF (<\/span>PHO)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco S&amp;P Global Water Index ETF (CGW)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust Water ETF (FIW)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA)<\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Current ValuEngine reports on these ETF\u2019s can be viewed <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/rep\/mresearch_report\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although actively managed Climate-focused mutual funds have been around for more than a decade, active ETFs are relatively new entrants in this category.\u00a0 They are a welcome addition because separating ESG data noise from signal is still being intensely debated in the ESG community.\u00a0 Additionally, most ESG data is more than one year old when finally published.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In a recent ETF.com article, author Jessica Ferringer noted wryly that the <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FlexShares STOXX US ESG Impact Index Fund\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">with <\/span><b>ESG <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">as the ticker symbol itself had an MSCI Sustainability Rating of just 7.6 as compared with 7.8 for SPY, probably not what ESG investors expected. A number of other index products also had ratings barely differentiable in sustainability from SPY.\u00a0 Ms. Ferringer then mused on whether this was an area better served by active management.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For this analysis, we selected three actively managed funds that bolster the point, <\/span><b>ECOZ, ESGU and LCTU.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The other five funds are index-funds that follow specific algorithms to select impact stocks in alignment with UN-defined Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).\u00a0 These ETFs include fossil-free broad-based <\/span><b>ETHO, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">clean energy technology tech funds <\/span><b>QCLN <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>PBW <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and clean water fund <\/span><b>PHO.\u00a0 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">All eight of these ETFs are covered in ValuEngine ETF Reports<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Brief descriptions:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>ECOZ, TrueShares ESG Active Opportunities ETF <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is actively managed to invest in US large-cap stocks selected using a two-phase process. In the initial phase, fund advisors use their own analysis of quantitative data focused on carbon emissions combined with third-party scores to evaluate ESG characteristics and relative scoring. In the second phase, additional fundamental analytics are applied to determine each stock\u2019s relative value. Stocks are then ranked by ESG and relative value within their respective industries, with roughly 75-125 being selected for the investment portfolio.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>ESGA, American Century Sustainable Equity ETF <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2013 This is one of the first ETFs to use the nontransparent, NYSE Proxy Portfolio structure which discloses holdings only on a quarterly basis with a 15-day lag. The fund actively selects US large-caps using its own quantitative model to score stocks based on their value and growth potential with an overlay of ESG metrics, with the end goal of identifying most attractive ESG stocks. Each stock\u2019s final composite score is evaluated on a sector-specific basis, meaning those with the strongest score in their respective sector are considered for the portfolio.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>LCTU, BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is an actively-managed portfolio of large- and mid-cap US firms in the Russell 1000 Index that are selected and weighted with a preference for lower carbon emissions.<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">LCTU uses proprietary scoring criteria to assess the readiness of companies for a low-carbon economy transition, relative to their industry peers. The \u2018transition readiness\u2019 score includes five segments: Fossil Fuels, Clean Technology, Energy Management, Waste Management and Water Management. LCTU overweights high-scoring firms while mitigating risk. In addition to this strategy, firms may also be evaluated for good governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>ETHO, ETHO Climate Leadership ETF &#8211;<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> tracks the performance of an equal-weighted index that selects US stocks that exhibit the least carbon impact within its industry. Each company is measured according to their climate impact, which is calculated based on total greenhouse gas emissions from operations, fuel use, supply chain, and business activities, divided by market capitalization. The top scoring half in each industry is selected, while simultaneously excluding all companies in energy, tobacco, aerospace and defense, gambling, gold, and silver sub-industries.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>QCLN, First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QCLN holds a broad cap-weighted portfolio of US-listed firms in the clean energy industry. Eligible companies must be manufacturers, developers, distributors, or installers of one of the following four sub-sectors: advanced materials (that enable clean-energy or reduce the need for petroleum products), energy intelligence (smart grid), energy storage and conversion (hybrid batteries), or renewable electricity generation (solar, wind, geothermal, etc). Because there is subjectivity in classifying companies as \u201cclean energy\u201d, potential investors would be well-served by reviewing the fund\u2019s portfolio to make sure your definition of \u201cclean energy\u201d matches QCLN\u2019s.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>PBW, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PBW tracks a modified equal-weighted index of companies involved in cleaner energy sources or energy conservation. It is highly diverse in scope, reaching beyond just industry pure-plays like wind, solar, biofuels and geothermal companies, to include companies based on their perceived relevance to the renewable energy space. The fund&#8217;s proprietary selection process and its mandate are to hold only select US-listed companies that are perceived to benefit from the societal transition or advancement toward clean energy and conservation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>PHO, Invesco Water Resources ETF &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PHO is a water-themed fund of US companies that create products that conserve and purify water for homes, businesses, and industries. Securities also participate in the Green Economy, as determined by SustainableBusiness.com LLC. Holdings are weighted by liquidity, with no more than five companies capped at 8% and with the rest distributed equally. The index is reconstituted annually in April and rebalanced quarterly<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>ESG, FlexShares STOXX Select ESG ETF &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">follows a principles-based index composed of US-listed companies that exhibit environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) characteristics. Until recently, the fund was named FlexShares STOXX US ESG Impact Index Fund. STOXX is a Switzerland based index provider that launched as a pioneer in sustainable indexing more than 20 years ago.\u00a0 Selection factors are aligned with UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).\u00a0 They include: low emissions; board governance and inclusion criteria; policies against child labor, and non-use of golden parachute agreements. Disqualifying characteristics include non-adherence to UN Global compact principles, involvement in controversial weapons, or coal mining. All qualifying constituents are weighted based on an aggregated \u201cESG score\u201d derived from the factors mentioned above.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The following chart compares pertinent factors. A few of these factors including MSCI ESG Score, Start Date, P\/B ratio, P\/E Ratio and Expense Ratio came from ETF.com.\u00a0 The MSCI ESG Fund Rating measures the resiliency of portfolios to long-term risks and opportunities arising from environmental, social, and governance factors.\u00a0 The rest of the data came from the ValuEngine reports.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Current ValuEngine reports on these ETF\u2019s can be viewed <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/rep\/mresearch_report\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><b>ECOZ<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>ESGA<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>LCTU<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>ETHO<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>QCLN<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>PBW<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>PHO<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>ESG<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ValuEngine Rating<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>4<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>3<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>4<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MSCI ESG Score<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>8.6<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8.2<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.9<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.4<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6.7<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>10.0<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.6<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Start Date<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Feb-20<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jul-20<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apr-21<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nov-15<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Feb-07<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mar-05<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dec-05<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jul-16<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VE Forecast 6-mo. Price Change<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+2.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+2.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+2.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+2.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+3.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>+5.2%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+3.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+2.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VE Forecast 1-yr. Price Change<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+1.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+3.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>+4.7%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+0.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 1 mo. Price Change<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-5.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>-4.7%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-5.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-5.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-12.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-10.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-5.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-5.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 3 mo. Price Change<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-14.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-9.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-9.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-13.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-30.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-38.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-14.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8211;<\/span><b>8.8%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 1-Yr. Pr. Change\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>10.8%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-0.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-35.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-52.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 5-Yr Ann. Pr. ChangePrice\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">14.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>25.7%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">22.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">14.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">14.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Volatility<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>12.2%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">13.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">17.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">32.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">37.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">17.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">16.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sharpe Ratio\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>1.3* provisional<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<td><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/i><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.6<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.9<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.9<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Beta<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.06<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.07<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.98<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.07<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.45<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.50<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.95<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.00<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"># of Stocks<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">61<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">38<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>331<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">264<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">62<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">79<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">38<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">273<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Undervalued by VE %<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">55%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">66%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">52%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">56%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">63%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>79%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">38%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">46%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\/B Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.5<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.7<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>4.0<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.9<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.9<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.1<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\/E Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">34.6<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\/A<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>28.2<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">30.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-73.1<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-10.4<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">36.1<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>26.3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Div. Yield<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>2.4%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0<\/span><b>%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Expense Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.58%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.39%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.14%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.48%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.60%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.61%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.60%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.32%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Active or Indexed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Active<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Active<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Active<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indexed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indexed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indexed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indexed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indexed<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ETF Sponsor\/ Advisor if not the sponsor<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">True Shares\/ Purview Investments<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">American Century<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BlackRock<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(NOT iShares)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ETHO Capital<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">INVESCO<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NVESCO<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FlexShares\/Northern Trust<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Current ValuEngine reports on these ETF\u2019s can be viewed <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/rep\/mresearch_report\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Key Findings:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Six of the eight ETFs are rated by our ValuEngine models to outperform for the next 6-month and year-ahead periods.\u00a0 We think investments in all six of these ETFs are very timely right now. The funds with our top rating of 5 include: <\/span><b>ESGA, PBW, PHO and QCLN.\u00a0 <\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In descending order, the four ETFs top-rated for overall ESG performance by MSCI are: <\/span><b>PHO, ECOZ, ESGA <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>LCTU.\u00a0 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In keeping with the earlier ETF.com reporter\u2019s observation, three of the four are actively managed with only the indexed clean water ETF topping the more sector-diversified actively managed funds.<\/span><b>\u00a0 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even though all three are listed as ESG funds taking all the SDGs into account, all three also qualify as environmental impact funds.<\/span><\/li>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><span>The three actively managed ETFs all have less than three years of actual history and only <\/span><b>ECOZ <\/b><span>has two years under its belt. Still, the best performer for the last 12-months and 1 month, <\/span><b>ESGA,<\/b><span> is in the actively managed category with nearly a 10.9% 12-month return while the majority of the others had negative returns. <\/span><b>ESG <\/b><span>had the least negative return over the past three months and placed second for the past 12 months.<\/span><\/li>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><span>For long-term performance, the best ETFs were the clean energy ETFs despite the carnage they endured in the past year.\u00a0 5-year rates of return for <\/span><b>QCLN <\/b><span>and <\/span><b>PBW <\/b><span>respectively were 25.7% and 22% respectively as compared with 13.6% for <\/span><b>SPY<\/b><span>, the SPDR S&amp;P 500 Index ETF.\u00a0 On the risk side, they have by far the two highest annual price volatility records of this group at greater than 30% per annum.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><span>The two INVESCO indexed clean environmental ETFs, <\/span><b>PBW <\/b><span>and <\/span><b>PHO <\/b><span>both with top VE ratings, are the two oldest ETFs in the study.\u00a0 This is because they acquired a company called PowerShares that was a true innovator in providing and promoting ETFs fitting this category.\u00a0 Fittingly, PowerShares Founders Bruce Bond and John Southard now head a provider called Innovator ETFs.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><span>Surprisingly, the lowest expense ratio in this sample set belongs to an actively managed fund, <\/span><b>LCTU <\/b><span>by Blackrock at just 0.19%.\u00a0 The BlackRock brand is being used for the company&#8217;s active ETFs in lieu of the iShares brand for its indexed products.\u00a0 Continuing this aberration, the three most expensive ETFs are all indexed including the two from INVESCO, <\/span><b>PBW <\/b><span>and <\/span><b>PHO, <\/b><span>along with <\/span><b>QCLN <\/b><span>from First Trust.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><span>Only <\/span><b>LCTU <\/b><span>(<\/span><b>2.4%) <\/b><span>and <\/span><b>PBW (2.2%) <\/b><span>provide good dividend yields for investors, about 120 and 100 basis points respectively of <\/span><b>SPY. <\/b><span>Of the remaining ETFs, only <\/span><b>ESG <\/b><span>has a dividend yield above 1%. The Price\/Earnings ratios available on these ETFs are higher than that of SPY and two have negative P\/Es.\u00a0 On the other hand, except for <\/span><b>ECOZ, <\/b><span>most of the Price\/Book ratios are right in line with SPY, very close to 5.0 with <\/span><b>ETHO <\/b><span>and <\/span><b>LCTU <\/b><span>having the best ratios.\u00a0 On a stock constituent basis however, rather than a position-weighted average, ValuEngine\u2019s valuation ratings can help locate an above-average number of undervalued stocks in all of these ETFs other than <\/span><b>PHO, <\/b><span>the clean water ETF.\u00a0 <\/span><b>PBW <\/b><span>is a particularly fertile hunting ground with 69 of its 79 stocks classified as undervalued including top ten holding Daqo New Energy <\/span><b>(DQ). <\/b><span>With an outperform (4) rating, Jinkosolar holdings <\/span><b>(JOS) <\/b><span>may also be worthy of a long look.\u00a0 One caveat, about half of <\/span><b>PBW<\/b><span>\u2019s holdings are small-to-micro-cap stocks so there may be issues with liquidity.<\/span><\/li>\n<li aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Most of these ETFs are relatively small in Assets Under Management (AUM).\u00a0 The exception, surprisingly to me, is also the youngest.\u00a0 BlackRock\u2019s <\/span><b>LCTU, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the most institutionally priced, has more than $1 billion in AUM.\u00a0 Three others, <\/span><b>ETHO, QCLN <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and<\/span><b> ESGA <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">are also over $100 Million in AUM.\u00a0 Despite its long history and the highest rates of return of this group of ETFs, <\/span><b>PBW <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has just under $30 million in AUM.\u00a0 All three of the remaining ETFs are under $15 million in AUM with less than $5 million in <\/span><b>ESG.\u00a0 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I am not an alarm-bell sounder on low-AUM ETFs.\u00a0 The funds are backed by the underlying securities and even if a sponsor closes a US-stock-based ETF, investors will get out whole. Since these consist primarily with large-to-midcap US stocks, investors should do fine in the event of liquidation.\u00a0 <\/span><b>ESG <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by FlexShares is probably the most immediately vulnerable to possible liquidation.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available: \u00a0 <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuenginecapital.com\/\"><b>www.ValuEngineCapital.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><b>In summary, ValuEngine\u2019s models are calling strongly for a rally in these impact ETFs, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">particularly the three focused most directly on clean energy: <\/span><b>QCLN, PBW <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>PHO. ESGA <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is the highest rated active fund and also has better last-12-month performance than the other two.\u00a0 Going against the price trend and most pundits believing that clean energy stocks will remain out of favor for the foreseeable future, contrarians may wish to swoop in now. <\/span><b>ETHO <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>ECOZ <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">also should both be attractive now to contrarians.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although I generally discourage impact investors from quarter-to-quarter or even year-to-year performance comparisons, there is nothing wrong with having timing on your side if our models turn out to be prescient.\u00a0 However, I urge high conviction investors to look at the downloadable holdings files to make sure that holdings are in alignment with their values but not to worry too much about short-term fluctuations.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is where some investors including yours truly may have a problem with semi-transparent <\/span><b>ESGA, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">otherwise a very attractive investment option. It uses a proxy holdings file containing decoy securities to protect its positions.\u00a0 That may help the American Century team by being front-run in trades but provides less comfort on the values-in-alignment investor.\u00a0 Personally, for this reason, I hold a position in one of my portfolios in <\/span><b>ECOZ <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">which is a fully disclosed active ETF with a Chief Investment Officer, Linda Zhang, that I know well and for whom I have a very high personal regard..\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recently, I added a smaller position in <\/span><b>STNC <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by Stance Capital despite its very short history. <\/span><b>STNC <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">represents perhaps the best compromise to full position disclosure and opaque trading basket protection to shield ETFs from potentially large impact trading costs.\u00a0 It uses Shielded Alpha fintech from Blue Tractor Group.\u00a0 The result is that I know 100% of the stocks owned by <\/span><b>STNC <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">but competitive traders cannot see the amounts of those shares, if any, that may be sold (or bought) that day.\u00a0 <\/span><b>STNC <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Founder Bill Davis is also someone I\u2019ve followed for years and is also well respected in the \u201cESG Circuit.\u201d\u00a0 So as with many portfolio managers and investors as well as in keeping with the category, personal preferences play a role in how I wish to align the investment dollars under my aegis with <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">my<\/span><\/i> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">convictions<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0 Everyone should do their own research and exercise their own judgments.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/talkmarkets.com\/contributor\/Herbert-Blank\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Herbert Blank<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Senior Quantitative Analyst, ValuEngine Inc<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">www.ValuEngine.com<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">_______________________________________________<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><b>All of the approximately 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, 140 industries, and 600 ETFs have been updated on <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><b>www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5><b>Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available through <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuenginecapital.com\/\"><b>ValuEngine Capital Management, LLC<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5><b>Free Two Week Trial to all 5,000 plus equities covered by ValuEngine <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/pub\/VeSubscribeInfo?pid=1\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5><b>Subscribers log in <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/ve\/mainve?pid=1\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The trend is your friend.\u00a0 That is, until it isn\u2019t.\u00a0\u00a0 The list of best performing non-leveraged ETFs for the past 90-days is led almost exclusively by ETFs that hold the stocks of fossil-fuel-based energy and closely related companies.\u00a0 At the same time, the prices of ESG and more climate-focused impact ETFs have plunged dramatically.\u00a0 With &#8230; <a title=\"Time for Impact Investors and Contrarians to Unite Behind Clean Energy ETFs\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/time-for-impact-investors-and-contrarians-to-unite-behind-clean-energy-etfs\/\" aria-label=\"More on Time for Impact Investors and Contrarians to Unite Behind Clean Energy ETFs\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[130,1,39],"tags":[1961,1829,1962,1968,1761,1733,1964,1731,1963,1966,1967,1965,1510,1699,28,1656,63],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2845"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2845"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2846,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2845\/revisions\/2846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}