{"id":3169,"date":"2023-07-17T12:39:36","date_gmt":"2023-07-17T12:39:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/?p=3169"},"modified":"2023-07-17T12:43:59","modified_gmt":"2023-07-17T12:43:59","slug":"2023-midyear-review-of-index-etfs-and-smart-beta-strategies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/2023-midyear-review-of-index-etfs-and-smart-beta-strategies\/","title":{"rendered":"2023 Midyear Review of Index ETFs and Smart Beta Strategies"},"content":{"rendered":"

Approaching 2023, the experts were in near unanimity that the fourth quarter of 2022 was little more than a dead cat bounce and that once the inevitable recession hit, the bear market would quickly take the S&P 500 Index to new lows.\u00a0 Instead, the first six months have seen the Nasdaq-100 ETF, Invesco <\/span>QQQ <\/b>rise nearly 39% while <\/span>IVV<\/b>, the iShares S&P 500, gained 16%.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

All 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, 140 industries, and 500 ETFs have been updated.<\/b><\/h5>\n
Two week free trial:<\/b> www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n

The ETF reports on ValuEngine for ETFs that follow market benchmarks provide a side benefit in writing market analyses.\u00a0 They are a window to implicit forecasts for the 3-, 6- and 12-month forecasts that theVE models are making for each benchmark\u2019s ETF portfolio.\u00a0 This is because the ratings and projections combine bottom-up constituent analysis with analyses of the historical price movements of the ETF in different market environments. \u00a0 This empowers us to provide both look back analysis and also share our model\u2019s views on what lies ahead.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The benchmark indexes and ETFs analyzed here are:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The S&P 500 Index representing US Large Cap, the iShares ETF <\/span>IVV;<\/b><\/li>\n
  2. The S&P 400 MidCap Index representing US MidCap; the SPDR ETF <\/span>MDY<\/b>;<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. The Russell 2000 Index representing US Small Cap; the iShares ETF <\/span>IWM<\/b><\/li>\n
  4. The Russell 1000 Large Cap Growth Index; the iShares ETF <\/span>IWF<\/b>;<\/span><\/li>\n
  5. The Russell 1000 Large Cap Value Index; the iShares ETF <\/span>IWD<\/b>;<\/span><\/li>\n
  6. The Nasdaq-100, constructed as an index using the top 100 non-financial stocks with primary listing on the Nasdaq, but now regarded as the premier US Big Tech Index; the Invesco ETF <\/span>QQQ<\/b>.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    All historical data are as of 06\/30\/2023.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Current ValuEngine reports on these stocks or ETFS can be viewed<\/b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    <\/td>\nIWD<\/b><\/td>\nIWF<\/b><\/td>\nIWM<\/b><\/td>\nMDY<\/b><\/td>\nQQQ<\/b><\/td>\nIVV<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Market Index Being Tracked<\/span><\/td>\nRussell Large Cap Value<\/b><\/td>\nRussell Large Cap Growth<\/b><\/td>\nRussell 2000 Small Cap<\/b><\/td>\nS&P Midcap<\/b><\/td>\nNasdaq 100\u00a0<\/b><\/td>\nS&P 500<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    ValuEngine Rating<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n5<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n5<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Forecast 3-mo. Price Return<\/b><\/td>\n1.09%<\/span><\/td>\n1.03%<\/span><\/td>\n0.76%<\/span><\/td>\n+0.97%<\/span><\/td>\n+3.04%<\/b><\/td>\n2.13%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Forecast 6-Mo. Price\u00a0<\/b><\/td>\n3.40%<\/span><\/td>\n6.79%<\/span><\/td>\n2.54%<\/span><\/td>\n+3.12%<\/span><\/td>\n+6.86%<\/b><\/td>\n5.27%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Forecast 1-yr. Price Return<\/b><\/td>\n-2.54%<\/span><\/td>\n1.03%<\/span><\/td>\n-1.92%<\/span><\/td>\n-0.73%<\/span><\/td>\n+1.22%<\/b><\/td>\n-0.64%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 1 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n+5.62%<\/span><\/td>\n+5.94%<\/span><\/td>\n+6.71%<\/span><\/td>\n+7.34%<\/b><\/td>\n+5.55%<\/span><\/td>\n+5.61%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 3 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n+4.94%<\/span><\/td>\n+14.45%<\/span><\/td>\n+6.90%<\/span><\/td>\n+6.33%<\/span><\/td>\n+17.02%<\/b><\/td>\n+9.95%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 6 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n+4.08%<\/span><\/td>\n-28.44%<\/span><\/td>\n+7.40%<\/span><\/td>\n+8.16%<\/span><\/td>\n+38.73%<\/b><\/td>\n+16.01%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 12 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n+8.87%<\/span><\/td>\n+25.83%<\/span><\/td>\n10.58%<\/span><\/td>\n+15.82%<\/span><\/td>\n+31.80%<\/b><\/td>\n+17.56%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 5-Yr Ann. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n+4.10%<\/span><\/td>\n11.91%<\/span><\/td>\n1.31%<\/span><\/td>\n+4.33%<\/span><\/td>\n14.32%<\/b><\/td>\n+8.61%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Volatility<\/span><\/td>\n19.38%<\/b><\/td>\n21.06%<\/span><\/td>\n24.34%<\/span><\/td>\n22.90%<\/span><\/td>\n21.93%<\/span><\/td>\n18.89%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Sharpe Ratio\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n0.21<\/span><\/td>\n0.57<\/span><\/td>\n0.05<\/span><\/td>\n0.19<\/span><\/td>\n0.64<\/b><\/td>\n0.46<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Beta<\/span><\/td>\n0.98<\/b><\/td>\n1.08<\/span><\/td>\n1.17<\/span><\/td>\n1.14<\/span><\/td>\n1.10<\/span><\/td>\n1.00<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    # of Stocks<\/span><\/td>\n846<\/span><\/td>\n445<\/span><\/td>\n1999<\/span><\/td>\n400<\/span><\/td>\n100<\/span><\/td>\n500<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Undervalued by VE %<\/span><\/td>\n39%<\/span><\/td>\n28%<\/span><\/td>\n66%<\/b><\/td>\n38%<\/span><\/td>\n28%<\/span><\/td>\n32%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    P\/B Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n2.2<\/span><\/td>\n10.1<\/span><\/td>\n1.9<\/b><\/td>\n2.4<\/span><\/td>\n7.2<\/span><\/td>\n3.9<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    P\/E Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n16.2<\/span><\/td>\n34.1<\/span><\/td>\n28.8<\/span><\/td>\n14.1<\/b><\/td>\n33.4<\/span><\/td>\n21.2<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Div. Yield<\/span><\/td>\n2.1%<\/b><\/td>\n0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n1.5%<\/span><\/td>\n1.4%<\/span><\/td>\n0.6%<\/span><\/td>\n1.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Expense Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n0.18%<\/span><\/td>\n0.18%<\/span><\/td>\n0.19%<\/span><\/td>\n0.22%<\/span><\/td>\n0.20%<\/span><\/td>\n0.03%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Largest Holding Pct.<\/span><\/td>\nExxon Mobil Corp <\/span>(XOM)<\/b><\/p>\n

    2.24%<\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Apple <\/span>(AAPL)<\/b><\/p>\n

    <\/b>13.23% <\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Super Micro Com. <\/span>(SMCI)<\/b><\/p>\n

    0.46%<\/span><\/p>\n

    VE2<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Hubbell Inc. (<\/span>HUBB<\/b>)<\/span><\/p>\n

    0.77%<\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Microsoft <\/span>(MSFT)<\/b><\/p>\n

    12.91% <\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Apple <\/span>(AAPL)<\/b><\/p>\n

    7.61%<\/b><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    Index Provider<\/span><\/td>\nFTSE Russell Indices<\/span><\/td>\nFTSE Russell Indices<\/span><\/td>\nFTSE Russell Indices<\/span><\/td>\nS&P Dow Jones<\/span><\/td>\nNasdaq<\/span><\/td>\nS&P Dow Jones<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    ETF Sponsor<\/span><\/td>\n iShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\n iShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\n iShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\nSPDRs by SSgA<\/span><\/td>\nInvesco<\/span><\/td>\niShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    In contrast, here is the data table as of 12\/31\/2022 that we published in this blog this past January..<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    <\/td>\nIWD<\/b><\/td>\nIWF<\/b><\/td>\nIWM<\/b><\/td>\nMDY<\/b><\/td>\nQQQ<\/b><\/td>\nSPY<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Market Index Being Tracked<\/span><\/td>\nRussell Large Cap Value<\/b><\/td>\nRussell Large Cap Growth<\/b><\/td>\nRussell 2000 Small Cap<\/b><\/td>\nS&P Midcap<\/b><\/td>\nNasdaq 100\u00a0<\/b><\/td>\nS&P 500<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    ValuEngine Rating<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Forecast 3-mo. Price Return<\/b><\/td>\n1.32%<\/span><\/td>\n1.55%<\/b><\/td>\n0.9%<\/span><\/td>\n1.03%<\/span><\/td>\n1.25%<\/span><\/td>\n1.48%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Forecast 6-Mo. Price\u00a0<\/b><\/td>\n4.01%<\/span><\/td>\n4.56%<\/b><\/td>\n2.27%<\/span><\/td>\n2.91%<\/span><\/td>\n4.36%<\/span><\/td>\n4.40%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Forecast 1-yr. Price Return<\/b><\/td>\n-1.26%<\/span><\/td>\n0.63%<\/b><\/td>\n0.19%<\/span><\/td>\n-0.73%<\/span><\/td>\n0.07%<\/span><\/td>\n-0.33%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 1 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n-4.62%<\/span><\/td>\n-7.90%<\/span><\/td>\n-6.94%<\/span><\/td>\n-5.89%<\/b><\/td>\n-9.01%<\/span><\/td>\n-6.19%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 3 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n11.52%<\/span><\/td>\n1.83%<\/span><\/td>\n5.72%<\/span><\/td>\n10.24%<\/b><\/td>\n-0.12%<\/span><\/td>\n7.07%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 6 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n4.61%<\/span><\/td>\n-2.04%<\/span><\/td>\n2.95%<\/span><\/td>\n7.09%<\/b><\/td>\n-4.59%<\/span><\/td>\n1.37%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2022 Calendar <\/b>Price Return\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n-9.72%<\/b><\/td>\n-30.25%<\/span><\/td>\n-21.79%<\/span><\/td>\n-14.37%<\/span><\/td>\n-32.58%<\/span><\/td>\n-19.68%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Historic 5-Yr Ann. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n5.13%<\/span><\/td>\n11.06%<\/span><\/td>\n3.97%<\/span><\/td>\n6.15%<\/span><\/td>\n12.09%<\/b><\/td>\n8.61%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Volatility<\/span><\/td>\n19.38%<\/span><\/td>\n20.94%<\/span><\/td>\n24.07%<\/span><\/td>\n22.62%<\/span><\/td>\n21.93%<\/span><\/td>\n18.94%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Sharpe Ratio\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n0.20<\/span><\/td>\n0.44<\/span><\/td>\n0.11<\/span><\/td>\n0.22<\/span><\/td>\n0.49<\/b><\/td>\n0.38<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Beta<\/span><\/td>\n0.98<\/span><\/td>\n1.07<\/span><\/td>\n1.16<\/span><\/td>\n1.13<\/span><\/td>\n1.10<\/span><\/td>\n1.01<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    # of Stocks<\/span><\/td>\n853<\/span><\/td>\n513<\/span><\/td>\n1948<\/span><\/td>\n401<\/span><\/td>\n100<\/span><\/td>\n503<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Undervalued by VE %<\/span><\/td>\n41%<\/span><\/td>\n45%<\/span><\/td>\n69%<\/b><\/td>\n45%<\/span><\/td>\n41%<\/span><\/td>\n32%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    P\/B Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n2.5<\/span><\/td>\n9.8<\/span><\/td>\n2.1<\/b><\/td>\n2.4<\/span><\/td>\n6.6<\/span><\/td>\n4.0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    P\/E Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n16.3<\/span><\/td>\n27.5<\/span><\/td>\n27.9<\/span><\/td>\n14.1<\/b><\/td>\n25.3<\/span><\/td>\n19.8<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Div. Yield<\/span><\/td>\n2.1%<\/b><\/td>\n0.9%<\/span><\/td>\n1.4%<\/span><\/td>\n1.4%<\/span><\/td>\n0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n1.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Expense Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n0.18%<\/span><\/td>\n0.18%<\/span><\/td>\n0.19%<\/span><\/td>\n0.22%<\/span><\/td>\n0.20%<\/span><\/td>\n0.09%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Largest Holding Pct.<\/span><\/td>\nExxon Mobil Corp <\/span>(XOM)<\/b><\/p>\n

    2.44%<\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Apple <\/span>(AAPL)<\/b><\/p>\n

    <\/b>11.27% <\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Crocs Inc <\/span>(CROX)<\/b><\/p>\n

    0.32%<\/span><\/p>\n

    VE1<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Fair Isaac Inc <\/span>(FICO)<\/b>,<\/span><\/p>\n

    1.28%<\/span><\/p>\n

    VE4<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Microsoft <\/span>(MSFT)<\/b><\/p>\n

    11.95% <\/span><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n

    		Apple <\/span>(AAPL)<\/b><\/p>\n

    5.98%<\/b><\/p>\n

    VE3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    Index Provider<\/span><\/td>\nFTSE Russell Indices<\/span><\/td>\nFTSE Russell Indices<\/span><\/td>\nFTSE Russell Indices<\/span><\/td>\nS&P Dow Jones<\/span><\/td>\nNasdaq<\/span><\/td>\nS&P Dow Jones<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    ETF Sponsor<\/span><\/td>\n iShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\n iShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\n iShares by Blackrock<\/span><\/td>\nSPDRs by SSgA<\/span><\/td>\nInvesco<\/span><\/td>\nSPDRs by SSgA<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    Current ValuEngine reports on these stocks or ETFS can be viewed<\/b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

    The 6-month returns represent the first half of 2023.\u00a0 Comparing it to the same chart six months ago provides several underlying analytic observations beyond the reversal of the direction of returns.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. The order of returns for the six-month period was virtually reversed in terms of style and cap size.\u00a0 Large cap Tech (<\/span>QQQ) <\/b>and Large\/Mid cap Growth (<\/span>IWF) <\/b>crushed everything while the best performing ETFs of the sextet at year end 2022 lagged Large\/Midcap Value (<\/span>IWD)<\/b> and Midcap (<\/span>MDY<\/b>) lagged badly,\u00a0 The opposite was true in 2022.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. The ValuEngine predictive model predicted the reversal in the leadership, having rated the growth ETFs QQQ and <\/span>IWF <\/b>with ratings of 4<\/span> (Buy).\u00a0 In contrast, in the same January blog, <\/span>IWD <\/b>and <\/span>MDY <\/b>had been rated <\/span>2 <\/b>(Sell).<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Our predictive model is predicting even more of the same for the six-to-twelve-month period ahead. <\/span>QQQ, <\/b>Invesco Nasdaq-100<\/span>, <\/b>and <\/span>IWF, <\/b>iShares<\/span> Russell 1000 Growth, have our highest rating of <\/span>5 <\/b>(strong buy)<\/span> while <\/span>IWD <\/b>and <\/span>MDY <\/b>remain rated as <\/span>2 <\/b>(Sell).\u00a0 In street parlance, they are potential \u201csources of funds\u201d which means that current holdings in either or both could be sold, then re-deployed to <\/span>IWF <\/b>and\/or <\/span>QQQ. <\/b>The last sentence is just an explanation, not a recommendation.<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. From a valuation perspective, <\/span>QQQ <\/b>and <\/span>IWF <\/b>are very expensive as compared with S&P 500 ETF, <\/span>IVV.\u00a0 <\/b>This is true using all metrics from traditional financial ratios and dividend yields to ValuEngine\u2019s valuation model.\u00a0 This historical over-valuation is a major reason that\u00a0 many market pundits have predicted the onset of a tech bubble and subsequent crash. On a predictive basis, I believe such predictions are premature at best. But anything is possible.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
    5. On the other end of the valuation spectrum is <\/span>IWM, <\/b>the iShares Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF.\u00a0 Greater than two-thirds of its holdings are undervalued according to our valuation model. Remarkably, given the historical relationships between small cap and large cap stocks, <\/span>IWM <\/b>has an identical dividend yield to <\/span>IVV <\/b>and a 20% lower price-to-book-value ratio.\u00a0 Historically, the Russell 2000 small cap index has averaged about 33% of the dividend yield of the S&P 500 and has been about twice as high on the basis of price-to-book ratio. Investors using mean reversion as a factor may anticipate that eventually we will hit a period where small cap significantly outperforms large cap.\u00a0 Given that <\/span>IWM <\/b>currently has a <\/span>3 <\/b>(Hold) rating, such a commitment looks to be premature for now.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      In 2022, we noted the following return differentiation between winning and losing industry sectors in the market.\u00a0 We repeat the table here.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      <\/td>\n<\/td>\n2022<\/b><\/td>\nVE<\/b><\/td>\n% Under-<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Sector<\/b><\/td>\nTickers<\/b><\/td>\nPR Returns<\/b><\/td>\nDividend Yield<\/b><\/td>\nRating<\/b><\/td>\nValued<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Energy<\/span><\/td>\nXLE<\/span><\/td>\n64.29%<\/b><\/td>\n2.9%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n32%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Utilities<\/span><\/td>\nXLU<\/span><\/td>\n1.47%<\/span><\/td>\n2.9%<\/span><\/td>\n5<\/b><\/td>\n10%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Consumer Staples<\/span><\/td>\nXLP<\/span><\/td>\n-0.80%<\/span><\/td>\n2.4%<\/span><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Health Care<\/span><\/td>\nXLV<\/span><\/td>\n-2.04%<\/span><\/td>\n1.5%<\/span><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n23%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Industrial<\/span><\/td>\nXLI<\/span><\/td>\n-5.55%<\/span><\/td>\n1.5%<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n14%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Financial<\/span><\/td>\nXLF<\/span><\/td>\n-10.56%<\/span><\/td>\n1.9%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Materials<\/span><\/td>\nXLB<\/span><\/td>\n-12.32%<\/span><\/td>\n2.0%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n7%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Real Estate (REIT)<\/span><\/td>\nXLRE<\/span><\/td>\n-26.21%<\/span><\/td>\n3.0%<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/span><\/td>\n53%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Technology<\/span><\/td>\nXLK<\/span><\/td>\n-27.71%<\/span><\/td>\n1.0%<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n37%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Consumer Discretionary<\/span><\/td>\nXLY<\/span><\/td>\n-36.25%<\/span><\/td>\n0.9%<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n21%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Communication Services<\/span><\/td>\nXLC<\/span><\/td>\n-37.64%<\/span><\/td>\n1.3%<\/span><\/td>\n1<\/span><\/td>\n58%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

      The same table for the first six months of 2023 flips most of the above average ETFs to below average and vice versa as shown here.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      \u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\nMid-Year 2023\u00a0<\/b><\/td>\nVE<\/b><\/td>\n% Under-<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Sector<\/b><\/td>\nTickers<\/b><\/td>\n6-mo.\u00a0 Returns<\/b><\/td>\nDividend Yield<\/b><\/td>\nRating<\/b><\/td>\nValued<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Technology<\/span><\/td>\nXLK<\/span><\/td>\n37.26%<\/b><\/td>\n0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n18%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Communication Services<\/span><\/td>\nXLC<\/span><\/td>\n29.07%<\/span><\/td>\n0.7%<\/span><\/td>\n4<\/b><\/td>\n29%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Consumer Discretionary<\/span><\/td>\nXLY<\/span><\/td>\n28.24%<\/span><\/td>\n0.9%<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n24%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Industrial<\/span><\/td>\nXLI<\/span><\/td>\n5.24%<\/span><\/td>\n1.6%<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n19%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Materials<\/span><\/td>\nXLB<\/span><\/td>\n1.08%<\/span><\/td>\n2.0%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n20%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Real Estate (REIT)<\/span><\/td>\nXLRE<\/span><\/td>\n-0.24%<\/span><\/td>\n3.7%<\/span><\/td>\n1<\/span><\/td>\n42%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Consumer Staples<\/span><\/td>\nXLP<\/span><\/td>\n-3.06%<\/span><\/td>\n2.5%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n24%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Health Care<\/span><\/td>\nXLV<\/span><\/td>\n-4.92%<\/span><\/td>\n1.6%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n36%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Financial<\/span><\/td>\nXLF<\/span><\/td>\n-5.06%<\/span><\/td>\n2.0%<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n48%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Energy<\/span><\/td>\nXLE<\/span><\/td>\n-7.73%<\/span><\/td>\n4.0%<\/span><\/td>\n1<\/span><\/td>\n29%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Utilities<\/span><\/td>\nXLU<\/span><\/td>\n-7.90%<\/span><\/td>\n3.2%<\/span><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n23%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
      Current ValuEngine reports on these stocks or ETFS can be viewed<\/b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n
        \n
      1. The bottom three Select Sector SPDR ETFs in terms of price change at year end are now the top sector ETFs for the first half of 2023.\u00a0 Those ETFs are: <\/span>XLK<\/b> (Technology), <\/span>XLC (<\/b>Communications Services}, and <\/span>XLY (<\/b>Consumer Discretionary).\u00a0 On the other end of the spectrum, <\/span>XLE (<\/b>Energy) and <\/span>XLU<\/b> (Utilities) are the only sector ETFs to post positive returns in 2022.\u00a0 They were the two worst performers in the first half of 2023 with returns of -7.7% and -7.9% while the S&P 500 rose 16%.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. The 2022 year-end ValuEngine ratings did not fare nearly as well as our benchmark predictive ratings.\u00a0 The three ETFs with buy ratings, <\/span>XLF, XLE, and XLU,<\/b> all posted losses for the first six months of 2023.\u00a0 Not one of them has maintained its buy rating at midyear.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. The Financial Sector ETF, <\/span>XLF<\/b>, and <\/span>XLRE, <\/b>the REIT ETF, have the greatest percentage of undervalued holdings.\u00a0 They are also undervalued by traditional metrics.\u00a0 However, neither is rated as a buy by our predictive models.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        For the first time, we now include metrics on so-called \u201cSmart Beta\u201d or factor ETFs in the midyear review, as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        ETF Name<\/b><\/td>\nTicker<\/b><\/td>\nVE Rating<\/b><\/td>\n# of Stocks<\/b><\/td>\n6-Mo. Price Change<\/b><\/td>\n12-Mo. Price Change<\/b><\/td>\n5-Yr. Price Change<\/b><\/td>\nDiv. Yield<\/b><\/td>\n\n
        Volatility<\/b><\/h5>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares US Quality ETF<\/span><\/td>\nQUAL<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/span><\/td>\n126<\/span><\/td>\n18.35%<\/b><\/td>\n20.71%<\/b><\/td>\n8.32%<\/span><\/td>\n1.3%<\/span><\/td>\n19.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares S&P 500 ETF<\/i><\/b><\/td>\nIVV<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n3<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n500<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n16.01%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n17.56%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n8.61%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n1.5%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n18.9%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares Russ 2K Growth<\/span><\/td>\nIWO<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/span><\/td>\n1092<\/span><\/td>\n13.12%<\/span><\/td>\n17.62%<\/span><\/td>\n2.03%<\/span><\/td>\n0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n24.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Vanguard Dividend Appreciation<\/span><\/td>\nVIG<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n315<\/span><\/td>\n6.97%<\/span><\/td>\n13.22%<\/span><\/td>\n8.17%<\/span><\/td>\n1.9%<\/span><\/td>\n16.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Invesco Equal Weighted SA&P 500<\/span><\/td>\nRSP<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n500<\/span><\/td>\n5.94%<\/span><\/td>\n11.48%<\/span><\/td>\n6.42%<\/span><\/td>\n1.7%<\/span><\/td>\n21.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Vanguard Hi Div Yield<\/span><\/td>\nVYM<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n468<\/span><\/td>\n3.99%<\/span><\/td>\n1.63%<\/span><\/td>\n3.78%<\/span><\/td>\n3.2%<\/b><\/td>\n17.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares Russ 2K Value<\/span><\/td>\nIWN<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n1461<\/span><\/td>\n0.84%<\/span><\/td>\n-3.75%<\/span><\/td>\n-0.04%<\/span><\/td>\n2.3%<\/span><\/td>\n25.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares US Momentum ETF<\/span><\/td>\nMTUM<\/b><\/td>\n5<\/b><\/td>\n126<\/span><\/td>\n-1.15%<\/span><\/td>\n5.80%<\/span><\/td>\n4.15%<\/span><\/td>\n2.2%<\/span><\/td>\n19.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility<\/span><\/td>\nSPLV<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n100<\/span><\/td>\n-1.71%<\/span><\/td>\n1.31%<\/span><\/td>\n5.63%<\/span><\/td>\n2.2%<\/span><\/td>\n16.4%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

        Smart Beta ETFs are composed of stocks that\u00a0 index providers have determined as most representative of a particular factor regime reflecting market movements.\u00a0 They can include such things as quality (earnings consistency and financial strength), momentum, volatility, dividend growth, or dividend yield along with size and valuation.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        ETF Name<\/b><\/td>\nTicker<\/b><\/td>\nVE Rating<\/b><\/td>\n# of Stocks<\/b><\/td>\n6-Mo. Price Change<\/b><\/td>\n12-Month Price Chage<\/b><\/td>\n5-Yr. Price Change<\/b><\/td>\nDiv. Yield<\/b><\/td>\n\n
        Volatility<\/b><\/h5>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares US Quality ETF<\/span><\/td>\nQUAL<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/span><\/td>\n126<\/span><\/td>\n18.35%<\/b><\/td>\n20.71%<\/b><\/td>\n8.32%<\/span><\/td>\n1.3%<\/span><\/td>\n19.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares S&P 500 ETF<\/i><\/b><\/td>\nIVV<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n3<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n500<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n16.01%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n17.56%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n8.61%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n1.5%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n18.9%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares Russ 2K Growth<\/span><\/td>\nIWO<\/b><\/td>\n4<\/span><\/td>\n1092<\/span><\/td>\n13.12%<\/span><\/td>\n17.62%<\/span><\/td>\n2.03%<\/span><\/td>\n0.8%<\/span><\/td>\n24.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Vanguard Dividend Appreciation<\/span><\/td>\nVIG<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n315<\/span><\/td>\n6.97%<\/span><\/td>\n13.22%<\/span><\/td>\n8.17%<\/span><\/td>\n1.9%<\/span><\/td>\n16.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Invesco Equal Weighted SA&P 500<\/span><\/td>\nRSP<\/span><\/td>\n3<\/span><\/td>\n500<\/span><\/td>\n5.94%<\/span><\/td>\n11.48%<\/span><\/td>\n6.42%<\/span><\/td>\n1.7%<\/span><\/td>\n21.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Vanguard Hi Div Yield<\/span><\/td>\nVYM<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/span><\/td>\n468<\/span><\/td>\n3.99%<\/span><\/td>\n1.63%<\/span><\/td>\n3.78%<\/span><\/td>\n3.2%<\/b><\/td>\n17.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares Russ 2K Value<\/span><\/td>\nIWN<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n1461<\/span><\/td>\n0.84%<\/span><\/td>\n-3.75%<\/span><\/td>\n-0.04%<\/span><\/td>\n2.3%<\/span><\/td>\n25.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        iShares US Momentum ETF<\/span><\/td>\nMTUM<\/b><\/td>\n5<\/b><\/td>\n126<\/span><\/td>\n-1.15%<\/span><\/td>\n5.80%<\/span><\/td>\n4.15%<\/span><\/td>\n2.2%<\/span><\/td>\n19.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility<\/span><\/td>\nSPLV<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/b><\/td>\n100<\/span><\/td>\n-1.71%<\/span><\/td>\n1.31%<\/span><\/td>\n5.63%<\/span><\/td>\n2.2%<\/span><\/td>\n16.4%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
        Current ValuEngine reports on these stocks or ETFS can be viewed<\/b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n

        The top two performers for the first six months of this year and also during the past 12 months (excluding benchmark ETF <\/span>IVV)<\/b> were <\/span>QUAL<\/b>, the iShares US Quality ETF and <\/span>IWO, <\/b>iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Growth <\/span>ETF.\u00a0 <\/b>\u00a0Both are also rated <\/span>4 <\/b>(Buy) for the next 6-to-12 months by our predictive model.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        MTUM<\/b>, the iShares US Momentum ETF, gets our top rating of <\/span>5<\/b> (Strong Buy) for the year ahead despite performing miserably in an up market.\u00a0 Reassuringly, <\/span>VYM<\/b>, the high-dividend-yield ETF had the highest dividend yield, 3.2% while <\/span>SPLV, <\/b>the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF, indeed had the lowest volatility of 16.4%.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available:\u00a0 <\/b>www.ValuEngineCapital.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n

        I find it fascinating that for the 5-year period ending June 2023, not one of the eight \u201cSmart Beta\u201d ETFs outperformed <\/span>IVV<\/b>, the S&P 500 ETF on an annualized basis and only one, <\/span>QUAL,<\/b> outperformed <\/span>IVV <\/b>on a 6-month and 12-month basis.\u00a0 Perhaps the engineers that created these \u201cSmart Beta\u201d indices based upon historical data were not all that smart when it came to constructing factor index ETFs smart enough to outperform in the future.\u00a0 As a 40-year quant, I have concluded that what a quant does best is to predict the past with ever greater precision.\u00a0 As we all know from fund disclaimers, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance.<\/span><\/p>\n

        FINAL NOTE \u2013 A Tribute to Harry Markowitz<\/b><\/p>\n

        As a quant, I would be remiss not to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the great Harry Markowitz.\u00a0 Harry died on June 22 of pneumonia and sepsis at a San Diego hospital.<\/span><\/p>\n

        I state without fear of contradiction that Harry created the field of quantitative investment research when he first published his article \u201cPortfolio Optimization\u201d in 1952.\u00a0 It became a staple for financial analysts around the world.\u00a0 He made it clear through empirical research why investors should diversify investments based upon asset price history covariances using combinations of assets called portfolios rather than simply buying individual securities. Gradually his work helped change the emphasis of professional investors from simply buying \u201cprudent\u201d securities to optimizing the risk-return ratios in investment portfolios.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        The framework he helped pioneer showed the correlation between low-risk investments and low returns, and high-risk investments and higher returns. This innovative theory earned him the 1990 Nobel Prize in economics alongside William Sharpe and Merton Miller.\u00a0 Even this honor falls incredibly short of representing the magnitude of his continuing and consistent contributions to the industry.\u00a0 When Richard Michaud created an optimization technique that expanded upon Markowitz optimization by using stochastics to create efficient reasons, Markowitz openly welcomed the innovation as an improvement upon his basic thesis and offered Michaud encouragement.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        I had the privilege of meeting Harry in 1989 when he was consulting with DICAM, the asset management arm of Daiwa Securities.\u00a0 Beyond his incredible grasp of multivariate optimization, what impressed me most was the man\u2019s simple kindness and humility. Reading other tributes to Harry, these attributes have been confirmed repeatedly.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        Rest in Peace, Harry<\/span><\/p>\n

        _______________________________________________________________<\/span><\/p>\n

        By Herbert Blank<\/b><\/h5>\n
        Senior Quantitative Analyst, ValuEngine Inc<\/b><\/h5>\n
        www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n
        support@ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/h5>\n
        All of the approximately 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, 140 industries, and 600 ETFs have been updated on<\/b> www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n
        Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available through<\/b> ValuEngine Capital Management, LLC<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n
        Free Two Week Trial to all 5,000 plus equities covered by ValuEngine<\/b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n

        Subscribers log in<\/b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

         <\/p>\n

        \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

         <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Approaching 2023, the experts were in near unanimity that the fourth quarter of 2022 was little more than a dead cat bounce and that once the inevitable recession hit, the bear market would quickly take the S&P 500 Index to new lows.\u00a0 Instead, the first six months have seen the Nasdaq-100 ETF, Invesco QQQ rise … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[1865,2238,1760,1719,2242,1731,1770,1845,1928,1834,2188,2240,1833,2237,2241,1617,1510,1858,2243,2239,1467,2236,1729,1726,28,1656,2235,2021,1915],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3169"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3169"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3176,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3169\/revisions\/3176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}