{"id":3352,"date":"2024-06-28T21:02:26","date_gmt":"2024-06-28T21:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/?p=3352"},"modified":"2024-06-28T21:11:01","modified_gmt":"2024-06-28T21:11:01","slug":"targeting-tech-for-the-remainder-of-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/targeting-tech-for-the-remainder-of-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Targeting Tech for the Remainder of 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Targeting Tech Stocks Below The Magnificent Seven<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the rise of the largest technology stocks known as \u201cThe Magnificent Seven\u201d has not yet reached return levels experienced midway through 2023, they are off to another relatively strong start as a group.\u00a0 One stock that has stood out in particular is Nvidia (Ticker: NVDA) which has risen so high, more than 82%, that it now has the highest market capitalization in the US.\u00a0 Many strategists have been in the media this week suggesting that the market is too dependent on <\/span><b>NVDA<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, expressing fears that the perceived tech bubble could soon burst if tech leadership did not broaden.\u00a0 <\/span><b>NVDA <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has gone through the roof because its hardware is essential for further development to most of the established leaders in the Artificial Intelligence race.\u00a0 Its recent 10-for-1 split underscores the company\u2019s meteoric rise.\u00a0 However, as impressive as the rise of NVDA has been, opportunities in the tech sector clearly stretch below this one stock and its peers in the \u201cMagnificent Seven.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>All 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, 140 industries, and 500 ETFs have been updated:<\/b><\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Two-week free trial:<\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><b> www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><b>\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">________________________________________________________________________________<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Existing subscribers alert:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ValuEngine is preparing to launch a completely redesigned website in the coming weeks.\u00a0 Alerts and more information will be sent a few days prior to the launch.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">________________________________________________________________________________<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With an eye towards potential broadening of the tech sector opportunity set, this blog focuses on a few selected Technology ETFs. Three of these target a broad segment of stocks, of which most are not in the <\/span><b>QQQ<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, followed by a quick look at a few technology stocks most highly rated by ValuEngine.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>FXL &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This\u00a0ETF, sponsored by First Trust<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0offers exposure to the U.S. tech sector which makes it one of many options available to investors seeking to access an industry that is capable of remarkable rallies and steep declines over short periods of time. Given the sector-specific focus,\u00a0<\/span><b>FXL<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> may be too granular for those building a long-term, buy-and-hold portfolio, but can be useful for investors putting on a tactical tilt or looking to beef up tech sector exposure. <\/span><b>FXL<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019s primary appeal is the use of the \u2018AlphaDex\u2019 methodology which seeks to select the best tech companies from the Russell 1000 Index universe. This is done by ranking the firms on a variety of growth and value factors including momentum,\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ROE<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and CF\/P, just to name a few. Thanks to this method, the fund casts a much smaller net than others in the sector, holding just 85 securities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>PSCT \u2013 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This ETF, sponsored by Invesco, tracks a broad index of small companies in the information technology sector which the issuer considers to be the following areas; software, internet, electronics, semiconductors, communication and hardware. As a result, this fund tracks some of the quickest growing and most volatile companies in the technology sector. The fund focuses entirely on U.S. stocks and is relatively well spread out; it holds 130 securities in total and puts just 19.5% in its top ten holdings. Investors should also note that while this is a small cap fund it also offers exposure to other asset class sizes as well; mid-caps make up almost 2.1% while micro caps make up nearly 30% as well. As a result, this fund will be more of a growth play than one that presents strong value opportunities for investors. This fund could make an interesting potential complement for investors who are bullish on tech but already have significant exposure to large caps. This fund could also provide a different mix of companies and add to overall diversification within the sector.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>QQQJ<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> &#8211; The Invesco\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NASDAQ<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0Next Gen 100\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ETF<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0(<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QQQJ<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) tracks an index of the largest non-financial stocks listed on Nasdaq that aren\u2019t included in the Nasdaq-100 index.\u00a0 Many Nasdaq specialists refer to this ETF as Q Junior.\u00a0 <\/span><b>QQQJ<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> gives investors easy exposure to Nasdaq stocks positioned for potential growth. For investors concerned about a size bias in their tech holdings, Q Junior can also help offset the large-cap tilt of\u00a0<\/span><b>QQQ<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0and <\/span><b>QQQM<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These three ETFs are compared down below to two much larger ETFs that are dominated by stocks included in \u201cThe Magnificent Seven.\u201d\u00a0 These two larger ETFs are:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>XLK &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">State Street\u2019s XLK is known as the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund. To be included in this ETF, an S&amp;P 500 Constituent must be one of numerous sectors under the technology umbrella. This includes market segments like IT services, wireless telecommunication services, and semiconductors to name just a few. The fund invests in the who\u2019s-who of the U.S. tech sector, with major holdings in companies like Apple and IBM. With just 66 stocks, it is the narrowest of the ETFs featured in this analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>QQQ \u2013 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Invesco QQQ Trust Series I offers exposure to what has become one of the world\u2019s most widely-followed equity benchmarks, the Nasdaq-100.\u00a0 It is popularly considered the standard-bearer for the US tech sector.\u00a0 This is true even though it includes stocks that aren\u2019t in the tech industry and omits tech stocks not listed on the Nasdaq.\u00a0 The liquidity of this ETF as a trading vehicle is unmatched. That said, investors buying new shares for a long-term investment in US technology stocks may wish to use <\/span><b>QQQM<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> instead of <\/span><b>QQQ. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (note the original was designed as a Unit Investment Trust), <\/span><b>QQQM <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is often referred to as the Q Mini.\u00a0 This sounds a lot like the Q Junior but do not be confused. <\/span><b>QQQM <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">holds precisely the same portfolio as <\/span><b>QQQ. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The \u201cmini\u201d aspect is that it has a lower expense ratio, 0.15% as compared with 0.20% for <\/span><b>QQQ.\u00a0 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Of course <\/span><b>XLK, <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">discussed in the above paragraph, gives investors pure tech exposure, including companies listed on the NYSE and the Cboe, and does so for an even lower expense ratio, 0.09%.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>All 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, 140 industries, and 500 ETFs have been updated:<\/b><\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Two-week free trial:<\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><b> www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><b>\u00a0 <\/b><b>\u00a0<\/b><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Here is the data table comparing the 5 ETFs.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>FXL<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>PSCT<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>QQQJ<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>XLK<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>QQQ<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fund Name<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco S&amp;P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ValuEngine Rating<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>2 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(Sell)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1 (Strong Sell)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>2 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(Sell)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1 (Strong Sell)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>2 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(Sell)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forecast 3-mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.09%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.07%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.98%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.89%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>1.39%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forecast 6-Mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.18%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.66%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3.99%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>5.72%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.46%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forecast 1-yr. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-2.18%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-3.66%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-2.37%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-4.78%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>-2.03%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 1 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.66%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-2.59%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.25%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>9.28%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.46%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 3 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.46%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.52%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-2.84%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9.05%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>9.12%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 6 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.24%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-3.77%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3.43%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>19.36%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18.79%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 1-Year Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">17.83%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-3.78%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6.62%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>32.05%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">30.96%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 3-Yr Ann. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9.82%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.79%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-17.36%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>58.75%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">39.09%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 5-Yr Ann. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">15.02%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">12.28%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2.91%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>21.45%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">19.04%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Volatility<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">22.96%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">26.02%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">21.59%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">22.23%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>21.52%<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sharpe Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.65<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.47<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.13<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.97<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.88<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Beta<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.13<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.17<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.12<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.13<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>1.09<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"># of Stocks<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">97<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">68<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>100<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">66<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>100<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Undervalued by VE %<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">35%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">40%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>54%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">21%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">38%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\/E Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>16.4<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">19.2<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">17.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">23.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">39.2<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Div. Yield<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.7%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>0.7%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Expense Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.62%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.29%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.15%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.09%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.20%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Largest Holding Pct.<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), 2.52% VE4<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fabrinet\u00a0(FN),\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.84%\u00a0VE2<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Super Micro Com (SMCI), 3.33% VE 1<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft (MSFT), 22.8% VE 3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apple\u00a0(AAPL), 8.64% VE 2<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Index Provider<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FTSE Russell<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S&amp;P Global<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nasdaq<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S&amp;P Global<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nasdaq<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ETF Sponsor<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Trust<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SPDR<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invesco<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Current ValuEngine reports on all covered stocks and ETFS can be viewed<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/rep\/mresearch_report\"><b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first thing that stands out in this table is that ValuEngine\u2019s model rates all 5 ETFs as below the \u201cHold\u201d threshold.\u00a0 <\/span><b>FXL<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><b>QQQJ<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><b>QQQ <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">are rated <\/span><b>2 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">for Sell while <\/span><b>PSCT<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><b>XLK<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> are rated <\/span><b>1<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> for Strong Sell.\u00a0 Note that these ratings are related to the dismal, below-zero-return, one-year price-return forecasts for all 5 ETFs.\u00a0 The 3-month and 6-month outlooks are a bit more positive across the board.\u00a0 <\/span><b>XLK <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has the best performance track record throughout the past 5 years and ties for the highest dividend yield, although all of them are paltry.\u00a0 Tech is not the sector to invest in for current income or low valuations.\u00a0 That said, <\/span><b>FXL<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> has a P\/E ratio of just 16.4, which is below market average.\u00a0 Taken altogether, ValuEngine\u2019s forecasting model indicates that short-term-to-one-year investors may want to consider using these ETFs as sources of funds for other investments.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, there are several individual stocks in the sector that our predictive models like.\u00a0 The following stocks are all rated <\/span><b>4 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(Buy) or <\/span><b>5<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (Strong Buy) and have market capitalizations of $20 Billion or greater.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>NOW &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ServiceNow, Inc. provides end to-end intelligent workflow automation platform solutions for digital businesses in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company operates the Now platform for end-to-end digital transformation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotic process automation, process mining, performance analytics, and collaboration and development tools. ServiceNow, Inc. was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>PINS &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Pinterest, Inc. operates as a visual search and discovery platform in the United States and internationally. Its platform allows people to find ideas, such as recipes, home and style inspiration, and others; and to search, save, and shop the ideas. The company was formerly known as Cold Brew Labs Inc. and changed its name to Pinterest, Inc. in April 2012. Pinterest, Inc. was incorporated in 2008 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>SNAP <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8211; <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Snap Inc. operates as a technology company in North America, Europe, and internationally. The company offers Snapchat, a visual messaging application with various tabs such as camera, visual messaging, snap map, stories, and spotlight that enable people to communicate visually through short videos and images. It also provides Spectacles, an eyewear product that connects with Snapchat and captures photos and video from a human perspective; and advertising products, including AR ads and Snap ads, comprising a single image or video ads, collection ads, dynamic ads, story ads, and commercials. Snap Inc. was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in Santa Monica, California.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>DASH &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DoorDash, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates a commerce platform that connects merchants, consumers, and independent contractors in the United States and internationally. The company operates DoorDash Marketplace and Wolt Marketplace, which provide various services, such as customer acquisition, demand generation, order fulfillment, merchandising, payment processing, and customer support. It also offers membership products, including DashPass and Wolt+; DoorDash Drive and Wolt Drive, which are white-label delivery fulfillment services that enable merchants that have generated consumer demand through their channels to fulfill demand using its platform; DoorDash Storefront that enables merchants to offer consumers on-demand access to e-commerce; and Bbot, which offers merchants digital ordering and payment solutions for in-store and online channels. DoorDash, Inc. was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>WDC &#8211; <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Western Digital Corporation develops, manufactures, and sells data storage devices and solutions internationally. It offers client devices, including hard disk drives (HDDs) and solid state drives (SSDs) for desktop and notebook personal computers (PCs), gaming consoles, and set top boxes; and flash-based embedded storage products for mobile phones, tablets, notebook PCs, and other portable and wearable devices, as well as automotive, Internet of Things, industrial, and connected home applications. Western Digital Corporation was founded in 1970 and is headquartered in San Jose, California.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The following table compares the companies on their vital statistics.\u00a0 They are clearly all positioned as growth companies.\u00a0 None of the four pay dividends and all sell at extraordinarily high traditional price-to-earnings multiples.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0Ticker<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>NOW<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>PINS<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>SNAP<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>DASH<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>WDC<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>QQQ<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stock\/ETF<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>Servicenow<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Pinterest Inc<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Snap<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Doordash<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Western Digital Corp.<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Invesco Nasdaq-100 ETF<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Closing Price as of 06\/14\/24<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$728.58\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$43.83\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$15.84\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$112.05\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$78.12\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$479.19\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fair Value Per Share as of 06\/14\/24<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$801.94\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$34.69\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$25.86<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$119.60\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$64.92\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NA<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Past 12-month EPS<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>$8.48\u00a0<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$0.05<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-$0.82<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-$0.06<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$0.48<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$1.87\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Market Cap, (Billions)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">150.0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">30.0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">25.9<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">45.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>25.5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>187.5<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ValuEngine Rating<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>4<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>5<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>4<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VE Forecast 3-mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.09%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.34%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.32%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>6.58%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.55%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>1.39%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VE Forecast 6-mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8.02%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10.98%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.84%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>10.73%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">12.33%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>5.46%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VE Forecast 1-yr. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8.20%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">12.12%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18.77%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>22.72%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">11.75%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>-2.03%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.96%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>3.37%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-1.56%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-2.29%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>6.23%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>7.46%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last 3 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-6.53%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">30.14%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">42.86%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-15.47%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>28.49%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>9.12%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last 6 mo. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.08%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">17.29%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-7.17%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10.11%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>52.73%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>18.79%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 1-Yr. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">28.43%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">74.37%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">47.94%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">56.71%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>93.08%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>30.96%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historic 5-Yr Ann. Price Return<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18.39%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10.20%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.67%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-7.60%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>14.09%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>19.04%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Volatility<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>28.3%<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">50.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">69.2%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">54.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">45.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>21.52%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sharpe Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.65<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.2<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.07<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-0.14<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.31<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>0.88<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Beta<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.95<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.94<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.04<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.73<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.49<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>1.09<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Undervaluation Percentile<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">31<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">23<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>86<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">34<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">16<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>38<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\/E Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>85.9<\/b><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">876.6<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Negative<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Negative<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">162.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>39.2<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PEG Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4.0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1.9<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Not Meaningful<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>0.1<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>NA<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\/S Ratio<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">15.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9.5<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.4<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b>2.1<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b><i>4.9<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Div. Yield<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><b><i>0.5%<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"text-align: center;\">\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><b>Current ValuEngine reports on all covered stocks and ETFS can be viewed<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/rep\/mresearch_report\"><b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><b>Observations<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These technology stocks are all highly volatile and do not pay dividends.\u00a0 The valuations from a P\/E perspective are quite extraordinarily high, even when compared with <\/span><b>QQQ.\u00a0<\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of two exceptions to overvaluation, <\/span><b>SNAP <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is considered the most undervalued stock relative to our universe according to our valuation model which factors in growth expectations for the stock. The other exception is Western Digital.\u00a0 <\/span><b>WDC <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has a modest 2.1 price-to-sales ratio and a very low PEG (price-to-earnings-growth) ratio of 0.1<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">Western Digital (<b>WDC) <\/b>also stands apart from the others as being more tangible.\u00a0 It\u2019s the only firm of the five that\u2019s been in business more than 50 years, and it makes hardware and other physically tangible products.\u00a0 The other four are all successful service, software and social media providers.<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">Even alongside the other 5-rated stocks, DoorDash stands out to our model as having the highest projection for price gains in the next three to 12 months.\u00a0 On the other hand, it is by far and away the most volatile of the five stocks both by Standard Deviation and Beta.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><b>Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available:\u00a0 <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuenginecapital.com\/\"><b>www.ValuEngineCapital.com<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In conclusion, our predictive model and valuation model both are bearish on technology in general but they\u2019ve found a few hidden gems.\u00a0 Investors interested in staying in the sector but paring positions in Apple, Nvidia and Tesla may find some of these stocks worth investigating.\u00a0 However, such investors should fasten their seatbelts as all of these stocks are very volatile and many experts predict increased market volatility for the next 6 months.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">_______________________________________________________________<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><b>By Herbert Blank<\/b><\/h5>\n<h5><b>Senior Quantitative Analyst, ValuEngine Inc<\/b><\/h5>\n<h5><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><b>www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5><b>support@ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/h5>\n<h5><b>All of the over 5,000 stocks, 16 sector groups, over 250 industries, and 600 ETFs have been updated on<\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/\"><b> www.ValuEngine.com<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5><b>Financial Advisory Services based on ValuEngine research available through<\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuenginecapital.com\/\"><b> ValuEngine Capital Management, LLC<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<h5><b>Free Two-Week Trial to all 5,000 plus equities covered by ValuEngine<\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/pub\/VeSubscribeInfo?pid=1\"><b> HERE<\/b><\/a><\/h5>\n<p><b>Subscribers log in<\/b> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.valuengine.com\/ve\/mainve?pid=1\"><b>HERE<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Targeting Tech Stocks Below The Magnificent Seven Although the rise of the largest technology stocks known as \u201cThe Magnificent Seven\u201d has not yet reached return levels experienced midway through 2023, they are off to another relatively strong start as a group.\u00a0 One stock that has stood out in particular is Nvidia (Ticker: NVDA) which has &#8230; <a title=\"Targeting Tech for the Remainder of 2024\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/targeting-tech-for-the-remainder-of-2024\/\" aria-label=\"More on Targeting Tech for the Remainder of 2024\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[130,1,39],"tags":[2344,2343,1719,2211,1731,2341,2342,2283,1617,2005,1713,1827,1284,2340,2204,28,1659,63,193,1887],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3352"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3352"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3357,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3352\/revisions\/3357"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.valuengine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}